[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50801A14.5010003@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:02:44 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xen/lowlevel: Implement pvop call for load_idt (sidt).
On 10/18/2012 07:45 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>
>> OK... this seems like another excellent set of pvops calls that
>> should be nukable to Kingdom Come. There is no reason, ever, to
>> read the IDT and GDT from the kernel... the kernel already knows
>> what they should be!
>
> Even during suspend and resume cycle? There are the sequence of
> sidt/lidt calls being done there. And we do need to filter at
> least the sidt call - and in the case of ACPI suspend path,
> the lidt.
Yes, I am pretty sure we can make static guarantees on the IDT and GDTs.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists