| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121018101240.12bdbec3@mantra.us.oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:12:40 -0700
From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/6]: PVH: mmu related changes.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:31:08 +0100
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > PVH: This patch implements mmu changes for PVH. First the set/clear
> > mmio pte function makes a hypercall to update the p2m in xen with
> > 1:1 mapping. PVH uses mostly native mmu ops. Two local functions
> > are introduced to add to xen physmap for xen remap interface. xen
> > unmap interface is introduced so the privcmd pte entries can be
> > cleared in xen p2m table.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 174
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > arch/x86/xen/mmu.h | 2 + drivers/xen/privcmd.c | 5 +-
> > include/xen/xen-ops.h | 5 +-
> > 4 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> > index 5a16824..5ed3b3e 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
> > #include <xen/interface/version.h>
> > #include <xen/interface/memory.h>
> > #include <xen/hvc-console.h>
> > +#include <xen/balloon.h>
> >
> > #include "multicalls.h"
> > #include "mmu.h"
> > @@ -331,6 +332,20 @@ static void xen_set_pte(pte_t *ptep, pte_t
> > pteval) __xen_set_pte(ptep, pteval);
> > }
> >
> > +void xen_set_clr_mmio_pvh_pte(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long mfn,
> > + int nr_mfns, int add_mapping)
> > +{
> > + struct physdev_map_iomem iomem;
> > +
> > + iomem.first_gfn = pfn;
> > + iomem.first_mfn = mfn;
> > + iomem.nr_mfns = nr_mfns;
> > + iomem.add_mapping = add_mapping;
> > +
> > + if (HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_pvh_map_iomem, &iomem))
> > + BUG();
> > +}
>
> You introduce this function here but it is unused. It is not clear
> from the patch description why you are introducing it.
>
>
> > static void xen_set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long
> > addr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pteval)
> > {
> > @@ -1220,6 +1235,8 @@ static void __init xen_pagetable_init(void)
> > #endif
> > paging_init();
> > xen_setup_shared_info();
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > + return;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap)) {
> > unsigned long new_mfn_list;
> > @@ -1527,6 +1544,10 @@ static void __init xen_set_pte_init(pte_t
> > *ptep, pte_t pte) static void pin_pagetable_pfn(unsigned cmd,
> > unsigned long pfn) {
> > struct mmuext_op op;
> > +
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_writable_page_tables))
> > + return;
> > +
> > op.cmd = cmd;
> > op.arg1.mfn = pfn_to_mfn(pfn);
> > if (HYPERVISOR_mmuext_op(&op, 1, NULL, DOMID_SELF))
> > @@ -1724,6 +1745,10 @@ static void set_page_prot(void *addr,
> > pgprot_t prot) unsigned long pfn = __pa(addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > pte_t pte = pfn_pte(pfn, prot);
> >
> > + /* recall for PVH, page tables are native. */
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > + return;
> > +
> > if (HYPERVISOR_update_va_mapping((unsigned long)addr, pte,
> > 0)) BUG();
> > }
> > @@ -1801,6 +1826,9 @@ static void convert_pfn_mfn(void *v)
> > pte_t *pte = v;
> > int i;
> >
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > + return;
> > +
> > /* All levels are converted the same way, so just treat
> > them as ptes. */
> > for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++)
> > @@ -1820,6 +1848,7 @@ static void __init check_pt_base(unsigned
> > long *pt_base, unsigned long *pt_end, (*pt_end)--;
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > /*
> > * Set up the initial kernel pagetable.
> > *
> > @@ -1830,6 +1859,7 @@ static void __init check_pt_base(unsigned
> > long *pt_base, unsigned long *pt_end,
> > * but that's enough to get __va working. We need to fill in the
> > rest
> > * of the physical mapping once some sort of allocator has been set
> > * up.
> > + * NOTE: for PVH, the page tables are native.
> > */
> > void __init xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long
> > max_pfn) {
> > @@ -1907,10 +1937,13 @@ void __init
> > xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long max_pfn)
> > * structure to attach it to, so make sure we just set
> > kernel
> > * pgd.
> > */
> > - xen_mc_batch();
> > - __xen_write_cr3(true, __pa(init_level4_pgt));
> > - xen_mc_issue(PARAVIRT_LAZY_CPU);
> > -
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_writable_page_tables)) {
> > + native_write_cr3(__pa(init_level4_pgt));
> > + } else {
> > + xen_mc_batch();
> > + __xen_write_cr3(true, __pa(init_level4_pgt));
> > + xen_mc_issue(PARAVIRT_LAZY_CPU);
> > + }
> > /* We can't that easily rip out L3 and L2, as the Xen
> > pagetables are
> > * set out this way: [L4], [L1], [L2], [L3], [L1],
> > [L1] ... for
> > * the initial domain. For guests using the toolstack,
> > they are in: @@ -2177,8 +2210,20 @@ static const struct pv_mmu_ops
> > xen_mmu_ops __initconst = {
> > void __init xen_init_mmu_ops(void)
> > {
> > - x86_init.mapping.pagetable_reserve =
> > xen_mapping_pagetable_reserve; x86_init.paging.pagetable_init =
> > xen_pagetable_init; +
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap)) {
> > + pv_mmu_ops.flush_tlb_others = xen_flush_tlb_others;
> > +#if 0
> > + /* For PCI devices to map iomem. */
> > + if (xen_initial_domain()) {
> > + pv_mmu_ops.set_pte = native_set_pte;
> > + pv_mmu_ops.set_pte_at = native_set_pte_at;
> > + }
> > +#endif
>
> just remove the commented out code
Rats, this got sneaked in! I meant to remove it. I was testing it out
without the code. That if statement has been changing constantly to the
point where it became just native, and could be removed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists