[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121018174200.GA20508@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:42:03 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, lenb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3
and Xen (suprisingly small\!).
> As for 'perf', since Xen already provides a virtual PMU for HVM guests
> It's not clear why we would spend the effort to implement another
> mechanism for PV guests (instead of using the virtual PMU from a PVH guest).
Would that allow one to evaluate the performance/bottlenecks that the
hypervisor might have?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists