linux-kernel - [PATCH 09/21] TTY: n_tty, simplify read_buf+echo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1350592007-9216-10-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2012 22:26:35 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:	alan@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jirislaby@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH 09/21] TTY: n_tty, simplify read_buf+echo_buf allocation

ldisc->open and close are called only once and cannot cross. So the
tests in open and close are superfluous. Remove them. (But leave sets
to NULL to ensure there is not a bug somewhere.)

And when the tests are gone, handle properly failures in open. We
leaked read_buf if allocation of echo_buf failed before. Now this is
not the case anymore.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 drivers/tty/n_tty.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
index 8c0b7b4..f27289d 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
@@ -1561,14 +1561,10 @@ static void n_tty_set_termios(struct tty_struct *tty, struct ktermios *old)
 static void n_tty_close(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
 	n_tty_flush_buffer(tty);
-	if (tty->read_buf) {
-		kfree(tty->read_buf);
-		tty->read_buf = NULL;
-	}
-	if (tty->echo_buf) {
-		kfree(tty->echo_buf);
-		tty->echo_buf = NULL;
-	}
+	kfree(tty->read_buf);
+	kfree(tty->echo_buf);
+	tty->read_buf = NULL;
+	tty->echo_buf = NULL;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1587,17 +1583,11 @@ static int n_tty_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* These are ugly. Currently a malloc failure here can panic */
-	if (!tty->read_buf) {
-		tty->read_buf = kzalloc(N_TTY_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!tty->read_buf)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-	}
-	if (!tty->echo_buf) {
-		tty->echo_buf = kzalloc(N_TTY_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+	tty->read_buf = kzalloc(N_TTY_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+	tty->echo_buf = kzalloc(N_TTY_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!tty->read_buf || !tty->echo_buf)
+		goto err_free_bufs;
 
-		if (!tty->echo_buf)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-	}
 	reset_buffer_flags(tty);
 	tty_unthrottle(tty);
 	tty->column = 0;
@@ -1605,6 +1595,11 @@ static int n_tty_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
 	tty->minimum_to_wake = 1;
 	tty->closing = 0;
 	return 0;
+err_free_bufs:
+	kfree(tty->read_buf);
+	kfree(tty->echo_buf);
+
+	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
 static inline int input_available_p(struct tty_struct *tty, int amt)
-- 
1.7.12.3


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/