[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <507F6EB3.7030705@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:51:31 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
miaox@...fujitsu.com, wency@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-numa@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
On 10/18/2012 08:52 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> Ok, so it's been a week and these patches are still in -mm. This is what
> I was afraid of: patches that both Peter and I nacked sitting in -mm and
> allow a NULL pointer dereference because no alternative patch exists yet
> to fix the issue correctly.
>
> Tang and Wen, are you intending on addressing these problems (i.e. not
> touching the acpi code at all and rather clearing cpu-to-node mappings at
> node hot-remove) as we've discussed or do I need to do it myself?
Hi David,
We are working on this problem. Since it is complicated, it really
takes us some time. Sorry for the delay. :)
Actually, we intend to clear cpu-to-node mappings when a whole node is
removed. But the node hot-plug code is still under development, so I
think Wen will send a fix patch soon. :)
Thanks.
>
> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists