lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121018042916.GP2739@dastard>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:29:16 +1100
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxram@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	dave@...os.cz, tytso@....edu, cmm@...ibm.com,
	Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 00/13] vfs: hot data tracking

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 04:57:14PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:07:22PM +0800, zwu.kernel@...il.com wrote:
> >> From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
....
> > (*) Tested on an empty 17TB XFS filesystem with:
> >
> > $ sudo mkfs.xfs -f -l size=131072b,sunit=8 /dev/vdc
> > meta-data=/dev/vdc               isize=256    agcount=17, agsize=268435455 blks
> >          =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=0
> > data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=4563402735, imaxpct=5
> >          =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
> > naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
> > log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=131072, version=2
> >          =                       sectsz=512   sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1
> > realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0
> > $ sudo mount -o logbsize=256k /dev/vdc /mnt/scratch
> > $ sudo chmod 777 /mnt/scratch
> > $ fs_mark  -D  10000  -S0  -n  100000  -s  1  -L  63  -d \
> > /mnt/scratch/0  -d  /mnt/scratch/1  -d  /mnt/scratch/2  -d \
> > /mnt/scratch/3  -d  /mnt/scratch/4  -d  /mnt/scratch/5  -d \
> > /mnt/scratch/6  -d  /mnt/scratch/7
> > .....
> >      0     21600000            1      16679.3         12552262
> >      0     22400000            1      15412.4         12588587
> >      0     23200000            1      16367.6         14199322
> >      0     24000000            1      15680.4         15741205
> > <hangs here w/ OOM>
> ^^^^In this test, i haven't see you enable hot_track function via
> mount, why did it meet OOM?

I copied the wrong mount command. It was definitely enabled.

Cheers,

Dave.

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ