[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121019024355.613584683@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:46:58 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: [ 34/76] vfio: Move PCI INTx eventfd setting earlier
3.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
commit 9dbdfd23b7638d054f3b0e70c64dfb9f297f2a9f upstream.
We need to be ready to recieve an interrupt as soon as we call
request_irq, so our eventfd context setting needs to be moved
earlier. Without this, an interrupt from our device or one
sharing the interrupt line can pass a NULL into eventfd_signal
and oops.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
@@ -400,19 +400,20 @@ static int vfio_intx_set_signal(struct v
return PTR_ERR(trigger);
}
+ vdev->ctx[0].trigger = trigger;
+
if (!vdev->pci_2_3)
irqflags = 0;
ret = request_irq(pdev->irq, vfio_intx_handler,
irqflags, vdev->ctx[0].name, vdev);
if (ret) {
+ vdev->ctx[0].trigger = NULL;
kfree(vdev->ctx[0].name);
eventfd_ctx_put(trigger);
return ret;
}
- vdev->ctx[0].trigger = trigger;
-
/*
* INTx disable will stick across the new irq setup,
* disable_irq won't.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists