linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] posix timers: allocate timer id per process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:56:40 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	devel@...nvz.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] posix timers: allocate timer id per process

On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 11:50 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> v4:
> 1) a couple of coding style fixes (lines over 80 characters)
> 
> v3:
> 1) hash calculation simlified to improve perfomance.
> 
> v2:
> 1) Hash table become RCU-friendly. Hash table search now done under RCU lock
> protection.

This should not be in the changelog, only after the --- separator.

> I've tested scalability on KVM with 4 CPU. The testing environment was build
> of 10 processes, each had 512 posix timers running (SIGSEV_NONE) and was
> calling timer_gettime() in loop. With all this stuff being running, I was
> measuring time of calling of syscall timer_gettime() 10000 times.
> 
> Without this patch: ~7ms
> With this patch   : ~7ms
> 
> This patch is required CRIU project (www.criu.org).
> To migrate processes with posix timers we have to make sure, that we can
> restore posix timer with proper id.
> Currently, this is not true, because timer ids are allocated globally.
> So, this is precursor patch and it's purpose is make posix timer id to be
> allocated per process.
> 
> Patch replaces global idr with global hash table for posix timers and
> makes timer ids unique not globally, but per task. Next free timer id is type
> of integer and stored on signal struct (posix_timer_id). If free timer id
> reaches negative value on timer creation, it will be dropped to zero and
> -EAGAIN will be returned to user.

I wonder if some applications relied on our idr, assuming they would get
low values for their timer id.
(We could imagine some applications use a table indexed by the timer id)

> Hash table is size of page (4KB).

Only on x86_64. Why not instead saying hashtable has 512 slots ?

> Key is constructed as follows:
> key = hash_32(current->signal) ^ hash_32(posix_timer_id);

This is outdated.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
> ---

Thanks



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/