lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2012 01:34:40 +0000
From:	James Harper <james.harper@...digoit.com.au>
To:	Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>
CC:	Oliver Chick <oliver.chick@...rix.com>,
	"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] Persistent grant maps for xen blk
 drivers

> 
> This patch implements persistent grants for the xen-blk{front,back}
> mechanism. The effect of this change is to reduce the number of unmap
> operations performed, since they cause a (costly) TLB shootdown. This allows
> the I/O performance to scale better when a large number of VMs are
> performing I/O.
> 
> Previously, the blkfront driver was supplied a bvec[] from the request
> queue. This was granted to dom0; dom0 performed the I/O and wrote
> directly into the grant-mapped memory and unmapped it; blkfront then
> removed foreign access for that grant. The cost of unmapping scales badly
> with the number of CPUs in Dom0. An experiment showed that when
> Dom0 has 24 VCPUs, and guests are performing parallel I/O to a ramdisk, the
> IPIs from performing unmap's is a bottleneck at 5 guests (at which point
> 650,000 IOPS are being performed in total). If more than 5 guests are used,
> the performance declines. By 10 guests, only
> 400,000 IOPS are being performed.
> 
> This patch improves performance by only unmapping when the connection
> between blkfront and back is broken.

I assume network drivers would suffer from the same affliction... Would a more general persistent map solution be worth considering (or be possible)? So a common interface to this persistent mapping allowing the persistent pool to be shared between all drivers in the DomU?

James

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists