linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/4] x86, cacheinfo: Base cache sharing info on CPUID 0x8000001d on AMD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121019090209.GG26718@alberich>
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:02:09 +0200
From:	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] x86, cacheinfo: Base cache sharing info on CPUID
 0x8000001d on AMD


The patch is based on a patch submitted by Hans Rosenfeld.
See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133908777200931

Note that  CPUID Fn8000_001D_EAX slightly differs to Intel's CPUID function 4.

Bits 14-25 contain NumSharingCache. Actual number of cores sharing
           this cache. SW to add value of one to get result.

The corresponding bits on Intel are defined as "maximum number of threads
sharing this cache" (with a "plus 1" encoding).

Thus a different method to determine which cores are sharing a cache
level has to be used.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
index cd2e1cc..fe9edec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
@@ -750,37 +750,50 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct _cpuid4_info *, ici_cpuid4_info);
 static int __cpuinit cache_shared_amd_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index)
 {
 	struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf;
-	int ret, i, sibling;
-	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
+	int i, sibling;
 
-	ret = 0;
-	if (index == 3) {
-		ret = 1;
-		for_each_cpu(i, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu)) {
+	if (cpu_has_topoext) {
+		unsigned int apicid, nshared, first, last;
+
+		if (!per_cpu(ici_cpuid4_info, cpu))
+			return 0;
+
+		this_leaf = CPUID4_INFO_IDX(cpu, index);
+		nshared = this_leaf->base.eax.split.num_threads_sharing + 1;
+		apicid = cpu_data(cpu).apicid;
+		first = apicid - (apicid % nshared);
+		last = first + nshared - 1;
+
+		for_each_online_cpu(i) {
+			apicid = cpu_data(i).apicid;
+			if ((apicid < first) || (apicid > last))
+				continue;
 			if (!per_cpu(ici_cpuid4_info, i))
 				continue;
 			this_leaf = CPUID4_INFO_IDX(i, index);
-			for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu)) {
-				if (!cpu_online(sibling))
+
+			for_each_online_cpu(sibling) {
+				apicid = cpu_data(sibling).apicid;
+				if ((apicid < first) || (apicid > last))
 					continue;
 				set_bit(sibling, this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
 			}
 		}
-	} else if ((c->x86 == 0x15) && ((index == 1) || (index == 2))) {
-		ret = 1;
-		for_each_cpu(i, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)) {
+	} else if (index == 3) {
+		for_each_cpu(i, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu)) {
 			if (!per_cpu(ici_cpuid4_info, i))
 				continue;
 			this_leaf = CPUID4_INFO_IDX(i, index);
-			for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)) {
+			for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu)) {
 				if (!cpu_online(sibling))
 					continue;
 				set_bit(sibling, this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
 			}
 		}
-	}
+	} else
+		return 0;
 
-	return ret;
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static void __cpuinit cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index)
-- 
1.7.8.6



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/