[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508119CE.9070408@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:43:50 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: "linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: tegra: fix clock entry of slink controller
On Friday 19 October 2012 04:13 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
> The patch subject isn't entirely accurate here; this patch isn't just
> about fixing clock entries.
>
OK, then will break in two patches.
>
>> + OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-slink", TEGRA_SLINK1_BASE, "spi-tegra-slink.0", NULL),
> Here, can't we just use the existing device names in the clock files...
>
> So we can completely drop the changes to these two files:
>
I want to name the driver as spi-tegra-slink. When we add the sflash spi
driver for tegra20, the driver name will be spi-tegra-sflash.
Also current name is "spi_tegra" I do not want to name with "_". So it
is require to convert as "-".
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra20_clocks_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra20_clocks_data.c
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra30_clocks_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra30_clocks_data.c
> The device names will hopefully be irrelevant once we're able to use
> DT-based clock lookups.
Agree, but currently we can add this to have progress.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists