[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaNK5+5oQNmmyyF+bD=jJYXbHAJF6e8Xn3jtcR4hoXwrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:22:34 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] gpio/mxs: convert to use linear irqdomain
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
>> /* gpio-mxs can be a generic irq chip */
>> mxs_gpio_init_gc(port, irq_base);
> ^^^^^^^^
>
> So I know this one is not compile-tested.
No, which defconfig shall I use for this driver?
> This is exactly the reason why I have to use irq_domain_add_legacy
> other than irq_domain_add_linear when I add irqdomain support for the
> driver. The driver uses generic-irq infrastructural which needs
> irq_base for setup. So sadly, before generic-irq gets improved, any
> irq chip that uses generic-irq will have to use irq_domain_add_legacy.
Bah, I'm dropping this and a lot of the other patches as well.
I obviously do not understand the inner transcendental meaning of
irqdomains yet.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists