lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121019133244.GE799@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:32:45 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] cgroups: forbid pre_destroy callback to fail

On Thu 18-10-12 15:41:48, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Michal.
> 
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 03:30:46PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Now that mem_cgroup_pre_destroy callback doesn't fail finally we can
> > safely move on and forbit all the callbacks to fail. The last missing
> > piece is moving cgroup_call_pre_destroy after cgroup_clear_css_refs so
> > that css_tryget fails so no new charges for the memcg can happen.
> > The callbacks are also called from within cgroup_lock to guarantee that
> > no new tasks show up. We could theoretically call them outside of the
> > lock but then we have to move after CGRP_REMOVED flag is set.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> 
> So, the plan is to do something like the following once memcg is
> ready.
> 
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/22559/focus=75251
> 
> Note that the patch is broken in a couple places but it does show the
> general direction.  I'd prefer if patch #3 simply makes pre_destroy()
> return 0 and drop __DEPRECATED_clear_css_refs from mem_cgroup_subsys.

We can still fail inn #3 without this patch becasuse there are is no
guarantee that a new task is attached to the group. And I wanted to keep
memcg and generic cgroup parts separated.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ