[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508173D6.6040209@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:37:58 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
CC: Randy Wright <rwright@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke <tmac@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] function probe_roms accessing improper addresses
On 10/19/2012 08:30 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I don't think DMI checking is going to work, since (a) as you say,
> there's a risk that the ID will inadvertantly change over the lifecycle
> of the machine, and (b) there may be other machines. So if it's not
> possible to handle this by catching the MCE, I think we have two
> options:
>
> 1) Declare that any x86 hardware supported by Linux *must* support
> probing in this address region
>
> 2) Don't call probe_roms() by default, but leave it up to the graphics
> drivers. If they can get the rom by any other means then don't call it.
>
Honestly, (1) is the proper option. Hearing that this is a prototype, I
would like to say "fix your bloody hardware/firmware"...
The legacy region is special and will always be special, and so any
attempts at making it non-special is a losing battle.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists