linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] acpi,memory-hotplug : implement framework for hot removing memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <10485269.ao9A69hu9S@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:32:42 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	wency@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, liuj97@...il.com, len.brown@...el.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, muneda.takahiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] acpi,memory-hotplug : implement framework for hot removing memory

On Friday 19 of October 2012 18:03:57 wency@...fujitsu.com wrote:
> From: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
> 
> The patch-set implements a framework for hot removing memory.
> 
> The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
> 1. send eject request by SCI
> 2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
> 
> In the 1st case, acpi_memory_disable_device() will be called.
> In the 2nd case, acpi_memory_device_remove() will be called.
> acpi_memory_device_remove() will also be called when we unbind the
> memory device from the driver acpi_memhotplug or a driver initialization
> fails.
> 
> acpi_memory_disable_device() has already implemented a code which
> offlines memory and releases acpi_memory_info struct . But
> acpi_memory_device_remove() has not implemented it yet.
> 
> So the patch prepares the framework for hot removing memory and
> adds the framework into acpi_memory_device_remove().
> 
> The last version of this patchset is here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/3/126
> 
> Changelos from v1 to v2:
>   Patch1: use acpi_bus_trim() instead of acpi_bus_remove()
>   Patch2: new patch, introduce a lock to protect the list
>   Patch3: remove memory too when type is ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_NORMAL
>   Note: I don't send [Patch2-4 v1] in this series because they
>   are no logical changes in these 3 patches.
> 
> Wen Congyang (2):
>   acpi,memory-hotplug: call acpi_bus_trim() to remove memory device
>   acpi,memory-hotplug: introduce a mutex lock to protect the list in
>     acpi_memory_device
> 
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu (1):
>   acpi,memory-hotplug : add memory offline code to
>     acpi_memory_device_remove()
> 
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |   51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> --

Can you please tell me what kernel is the series supposed to apply to?
Is it the current Linus' tree, or linux-next, or something else?

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/