[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50819CED.30803@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:33:17 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Linux kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: question on NUMA page migration
On 10/19/2012 01:53 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 13:13 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> Another alternative might be to do the put_page inside
>> do_prot_none_numa(). That would be analogous to do_wp_page
>> disposing of the old page for the caller.
>
> It'd have to be inside migrate_misplaced_page(), can't do before
> isolate_lru_page() or the page might disappear. Doing it after is
> (obviously) too late.
Keeping an extra refcount on the page might _still_
result in it disappearing from the process by some
other means, in-between you grabbing the refcount
and invoking migration of the page.
>> I am not real happy about NUMA migration introducing its own
>> migration mode...
>
> You didn't seem to mind too much earlier, but I can remove it if you
> want.
Could have been reviewing fatigue :)
And yes, it would have been nice to not have a special
migration mode for sched/numa.
Speaking of, when do you guys plan to submit a (cleaned up)
version of the sched/numa patch series for review on lkml?
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists