[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121019200235.GN13370@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:02:35 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, oleg@...hat.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.8] cgroup_freezer: allow migration
regardless of freezer state and update locking
Hey, Matt.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 06:29:45PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> Yeah, that would be a nice cleanup too. I guess the ultra-careful way to
> remove this feature would be something like:
>
> Add an internal migration restriction (which may or may not be
> exported as a userspace interface in a subsequent
> patch).
>
> Make the cgroup freezer use it.
>
> Make the cgroup freezer WARN_ONCE() when the subsystem is first
> mounted. Indicates that the behavior is going to
> change.
>
> ... time passes ...
>
> Remove the use of the migration "lock" from the cgroup freezer
> and the WARN_ONCE().
>
> Which would also make the feature more obvious.
I don't think I'm gonna go that far for this. I don't think we need
cgroup migration locking after all.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists