[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121019203606.GU13370@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:36:06 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, neilb@...e.de,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/26] block: Convert integrity to bvec_alloc_bs(),
and a bugfix
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 01:34:21PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 01:09:04PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > This adds a pointer to the bvec array to struct bio_integrity_payload,
> > instead of the bvecs always being inline; then the bvecs are allocated
> > with bvec_alloc_bs().
> >
> > This is needed eventually for immutable bio vecs - immutable bvecs
> > aren't useful if we still have to copy them, hence the need for the
> > pointer. Less code is always nice too, though.
> >
> > Also fix an amusing bug in bio_integrity_split() - struct bio_pair
> > doesn't have the integrity bvecs after the bio_integrity_payloads, so
> > there was a buffer overrun. The code was confusing pointers with arrays.
>
> Ummm... patch description doesn't agree with the patch content?
And the patch posted doesn't match the commit in git branch.
Dazed and confused. Bailing out. Let's retry next time.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists