linux-kernel - re: Optimizing scheduling policies for Ubuntu (desktop), for low-jitter.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <op.wmf8svxp6426ze@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 20 Oct 2012 01:27:57 +0200
From:	Uwaysi Bin Kareem <uwaysi.bin.kareem@...adoxuncreated.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: re: Optimizing scheduling policies for Ubuntu (desktop),
 for low-jitter.

Not many are discussing this.

So odd since an overloaded computer, looks like a computer with jitter. So  
removing jitter = higher performance.

I changed X to nice -20 though instead. It is hard to predict jitter, and  
maybe some measure of fairness is good.
Still daemons wouldn`t mind running sequentially as simple round robin,  
or? I would like to see a lowpriority round-robin, and not just the  
realtime one. Maybe a modification on "idle" pri. I just want to know  
daemons can be made transparent to jitter. Or atleast some measure of  
fairness to sequentialness that keeps the lowest jitter.

Anyone following ? :)

Peace Be With You.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/