[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121019024358.002734440@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:47:13 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: [ 49/76] md/raid10: use correct limit variable
3.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
commit 91502f099dfc5a1e8812898e26ee280713e1d002 upstream.
Clang complains that we are assigning a variable to itself. This should
be using bad_sectors like the similar earlier check does.
Bug has been present since 3.1-rc1. It is minor but could
conceivably cause corruption or other bad behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -3158,7 +3158,7 @@ static sector_t sync_request(struct mdde
else {
bad_sectors -= (sector - first_bad);
if (max_sync > bad_sectors)
- max_sync = max_sync;
+ max_sync = bad_sectors;
continue;
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists