| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121020192215.GB555@elf.ucw.cz> Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:22:15 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Sooman Jeong <77smart@...yang.ac.kr> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Initial report on F2FS filesystem performance On Tue 2012-10-16 13:07:03, Sooman Jeong wrote: > > This is a brief summary of our initial filesystem performance study of f2fs against existing two filesystems in linux: EXT4, NILFS2, and f2fs. > Hmm, flashes are actually optimized for VFAT, right? Can you compare against that? What about something more complex like "untar of kernel tree"? Ouch and... thanks for doing this. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists