linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!).

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOvdn6V+R2+Ur-_KXWffawrLNDph7+R8UHTfwrdJo-1gUGj6xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:23:55 -0400
From:	Ben Guthro <ben@...hro.net>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!).

ack.
I'm happy to test a 2nd round, if you CC me on any fixed patches (just
in case I'm not monitoring lkml / xen-devel on that particular day)

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:00:29PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
>> I'm not sure it matters, but I'm testing against a changeset about a week old:
>> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=1c4a5b37b55c56e49135e65728137f54288d1fe6
>
> I was able to reproduce it with Xen 4.2 so found the culprit.
>
> .. And then another issue :-(
>
>>
>> Plus patches specific to XenClient Enterprise.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:46:09PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> >> <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> > The end result is this is a nice set of patches where there is only
>> >> > _one_ change in the x86 code (and it is just more of dealing with
>> >> > error case) - and the rest are all done in Xen side.
>> >>
>> >> I'm sorry to report that this series doesn't seem to work in my setup
>> >> against xen-unstable.
>> >>
>> >> To verify that it was, in fact this patch series, and not another Xen
>> >> regression - I swapped out the kernel with this patch series, with an
>> >> identical one, replacing only this series with your acpi-s3.v9 branch
>> >> - and everything worked fine.
>> >
>> > Thanks for testing it!
>> >
>> > I had tested it with Xen 4.1.3, which could be doing something different.
>> > Will see what is up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/