[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121020180436.c42b7325431fe87104b008fa@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:04:36 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.7-rc0
Hi all,
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 07:50:52 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >>
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/penberg/linux.git kvmtool/for-linus
> >
> > So you have not taken this in the v3.7 merge window.
> >
> > Will you ever merge this?
>
> I have yet to see a compelling argument for merging it. It's tons of
> code, it doesnt match the original "small simple" model, and I think
> it would be better off as a separate project.
So are there any compelling arguments from the proponents, or can I
remove this from linux-next (and have it removed from the tip auto-latest
branch)?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists