[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121021165523.GA29247@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:55:23 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: SNB exclusive PMU access for
INST_RETIRED:PREC_DIST
* Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > This isn't limited to admin, right? So the above turns into a DoS on the
> > > > console.
> > > >
> > > Ok, so how about a WARN_ON_ONCE() instead?
> >
> > That should be fine I guess ;-)
>
> imho there is need for a generic mechanism to return an error
> string to the user program without such hacks.
Agreed - we could return an 'extended errno' long error return
value, which in reality is a pointer to an error string (in
perf_attr::error_str), and copy that string to user-space at
perf syscall return time.
Thus error-string aware tooling could print the error string.
So PMU drivers could do something obvious like:
return (long)"perf: INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST only works in exclusive mode";
The perf syscall notices these pointers by noticing that the
error code returned is outside the errno range.
Old userspace will get a -EINVAL and no string copied into the
error string buffer.
New userspace would get the error string copied into
perf_attr::error_str, plus a 'normal' -EINVAL error code.
The only cost on the kernel side is to make sure all "string
errors" are returned as long.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists