lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 19:15:43 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Cc: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.7-rc0 On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 05:03:05PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > The best way to compare them would be a script that gives exactly the > same test environment that 'vm run' / 'vm sandbox' does out of box, > but using qemu. > > If such a script is available then that would certainly be a useful > testing option to kernel developers. Right, I gotta say, I've mucked around with qemu/kvm net options as a novice user and haven't always been successfu. If you get host networking straight away in lkvm then that's another clear point for tools/kvm. Same holds true for copying data back and forth between host and guest. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists