[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121021171543.GC20642@liondog.tnic>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 19:15:43 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.7-rc0
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 05:03:05PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> The best way to compare them would be a script that gives exactly the
> same test environment that 'vm run' / 'vm sandbox' does out of box,
> but using qemu.
>
> If such a script is available then that would certainly be a useful
> testing option to kernel developers.
Right,
I gotta say, I've mucked around with qemu/kvm net options as a novice
user and haven't always been successfu. If you get host networking
straight away in lkvm then that's another clear point for tools/kvm.
Same holds true for copying data back and forth between host and guest.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists