linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xtensa tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50848BCC.9030208@zankel.net>
Date:	Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:57:00 -0700
From:	Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xtensa tree with Linus' tree

Hi Stephen,

Sorry, I accidentally pushed this patch up; should be fixed the next 
next time you pull.

Thanks,
-Chris



On 10/21/2012 04:40 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xtensa tree got a conflict in
> arch/xtensa/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h between commit 7216cabfff51
> ("xtensa: add missing system calls to the syscall table") from Linus'
> tree and commit daff2ab722aa ("xtensa: add missing system calls to the
> syscall table") from the xtensa tree.
>
> These clearly were meant to be the same patch but the on in Linus' tree
> has a later date, so I used it and can carry the fix as necessary (no
> action is required).
>
> Also, the top most commit in the xtensa tree has no signed-off-by line or
> any real commit message.  Please fix that up.
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/