[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121021081329.GA1959@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 01:13:29 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] char_dev: allow setting up and pinning parent devices
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:39:28AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:24:30AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > In certain cases (for example when a cdev structure is embedded into
> > another object whose lifetime is controlled by a separate device object)
> > it is beneficial to tie lifetime of another struct device to the lifetime
> > of character device so that related object is not freed until after
> > char_dev object is freed. To achieve this allow setting a "parent" device
> > for character devices and pin them when doing cdev_add() and unpin when
> > last reference to cdev structure is being released.
>
> Why struct device and not simply struct kobject?
It was more convenient for my uses and I also think that parents of
character devices will be struct devices... I however will not insist
and if you prefer using more generic kobject I can change it,
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists