[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121021150305.GA26108@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 17:03:05 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.7-rc0
* richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote:
> qemu supports all these features.
> E.g. to access the host fs use:
> qemu ... \
> -fsdev local,security_model=passthrough,id=fsdev-root,path=/your/root/,readonly
> \
> -device virtio-9p-pci,id=fs-root,fsdev=fsdev-root,mount_tag=rootshare
The best way to compare them would be a script that gives
exactly the same test environment that 'vm run' / 'vm sandbox'
does out of box, but using qemu.
If such a script is available then that would certainly be a
useful testing option to kernel developers.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists