[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121022084016.GB1758@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:40:16 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] perf tool: Use PERF_EVENT_IOC_ID perf ioctl to
read event id
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:57:24PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a minor nitpicking..
>
>
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 16:33:11 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > Changing the way we retrieve the event ID. Instead of parsing out
> > the ID out of the read data, using the PERF_EVENT_IOC_ID ioctl.
> >
> > Keeping the old way in place to support kernels without
> > PERF_EVENT_IOC_ID ioctl support.
> [snip]
> > + } else if (errno)
> > + return -1;
>
> Is this check really needed? I think that returning non-zero from the
> ioctl always sets the errno, no? How about this:
>
> ret = ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ID, &id);
> if (!ret)
> goto add;
>
> if (errno != ENOTTY)
> return -1;
>
> ...
>
> I guess that it'll show you better diff stat. :)
yep, looks better.. v2 candidate ;)
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists