| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121022101804.GC8352@liondog.tnic>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:18:04 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"miaox@...fujitsu.com" <miaox@...fujitsu.com>,
"laijs@...fujitsu.com" <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
"wency@...fujitsu.com" <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Do not change worker's running cpu in
cmci_rediscover().
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:33:16AM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> I have 2 nodes, node0 and node1. node1 could be hotpluged.
> node0 has cpu0 ~ cpu15, node1 has cpu16 ~ cpu31.
>
> I online all the cpus on node1, and hot-remove node1 directly.
Hold on, I need to ask here: you soft-online all cores on node1 and
*then* you *hot* *remove* it? So with all cores online you physically
take out the processor from the socket? Am I reading this correctly?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists