[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121022105601.GS14033@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:56:01 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
CC: Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@...escale.com>,
"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>,
Simon Haggett <simon.haggett@...lvnc.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: gadget: Don't attempt to dequeue requests for a
disabled USB endpoint on Freescale hardware
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Simon Haggett wrote:
> > > > Some gadget drivers may attempt to dequeue requests for an endpoint
> > > > that has already been disabled. For example, in the UVC gadget driver,
> > > > uvc_function_set_alt() will call usb_ep_disable() when alt setting 0
> > > > is selected. When the userspace application subsequently issues the
> > > > VIDIOC_STREAMOFF ioctl, uvc_video_enable() invokes usb_ep_dequeue() to
> > >
> > > ensure that all requests have been cancelled.
> > >
> > > bug is on uvc gadget, then. Laurent ?
>
> We've discussed this topic a couple of months before. I believe that's not a
> bug.
>
> http://68.183.106.108/lists/linux-usb/msg68869.html
fair enough :-)
That's a different case, however. At the link above we're discussing
dequeueing a request which is already being dequeued. $SUBJECT is trying
to fix dequeueing of a request for an endpoint which isn't even enabled.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists