[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121022120558.14413.78980.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:05:58 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Provide a comment in uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
Provide a comment in the empty uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h to make sure that the
patch program doesn't delete it.
However, should some part of asm/hw_breakpoint.h actually be exported here,
or, possibly, should the entire uapi file be removed? In v3.6, though the
file was marked for export to userspace, it had nothing outside of __KERNEL__.
This needs to be applied on top of the x86 UAPI disintegration patch.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
index e69de29..91cb766 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+/*
+ * x86 hardware breakpoint stuff.
+ */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists