[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1350910971.28457.3.camel@thor>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:02:51 -0400
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Ken O'Brien <kernel@...obrien.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
swetland@...gle.com, arve@...roid.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: android: checkpatch.pl fixes
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 05:15 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> waOn Mon, 2012-10-22 at 10:37 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2012-10-20 at 23:33 +0100, Ken O'Brien wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > - pr_err("binder: %d: binder_alloc_buf failed to "
> > > > + pr_err("binder: %d: binder_alloc_buf failed to " \
> > > > "map pages in userspace, no vma\n", proc->pid);
> > > ...
> > > Nice try, but the "right" way to do this is to coalesce formats like:
> > >
> > > pr_err("binder: %d: binder_alloc_buf failed to map pages in userspace, no vma\n",
> > > proc->pid);
> >
> > Surely the right way is to fix _checkpatch_ to see ["]\n\s*["] and merge the
> > lines before checking them? We shouldn't have to fix up the source in either
> > of these fashions just because checkpatch is broken.
>
> checkpatch is stupid, but it's not broken here.
>
> Formats should be coalesced into a single line to make
> grepping the source for dmesg output easier.
But MODULE_PARM_DESC() multi-line strings are ok, right?
grep - 'MODULE_PARM_DESC.*"$' drivers
shows it's in widespread use.
> More likely checkpatch could be changed to bleat yet
> another warning like
>
> "line continuation used outside macro definition"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists