linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the generic clock API available by default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121022130556.GM21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:05:57 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the generic clock API available by default

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:02:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> @@ -327,6 +328,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91
>  	select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
>  	select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
>  	select HAVE_CLK
> +	select HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK

This is silly.  If you select "HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK" then isn't it true that
"HAVE_CLK" should also be selected?  If so, why not have "HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK"
do that selection and remove it from all these entries?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/