linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: Ux500: Control apb clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:07:18 +0200
From:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...ricsson.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Ola Lilja <ola.o.lilja@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: Ux500: Control apb clock

On 22 October 2012 15:32, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:32:05PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
>>
>> When switching to common clock driver for ux500 this clock needs to
>> be handled as well. Before this clock was internally managed by the
>> clock driver itself.
>
> Applied but why isn't this a deficiency in the common clock
> implementation for the platform?

Good question. :-) Patches have just been sent to Mike Turquette clk
tree for adding the clock lookups.
First, I thought I might wanted to group them all in a series but
decided that splitting them are probably easier to handle.

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/