lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121022151927.GG22780@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:19:27 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/19] x86, mm: Let "memmap=" take more entries one time

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 01:50:29PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Current "memmap=" only can take one entry every time.
> when we have more entries, we have to use memmap= for each of them.
> 
> For pxe booting, we have command line length limitation, those extra
> "memmap=" would waste too much space.
> 
> This patch make memmap= could take several entries one time,
> and those entries will be split with ','

Um, not sure what this patch has to do with this patchset?
Should this be sent seperatly?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/e820.c |   16 +++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> index ed858e9..f281328 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> @@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ static int __init parse_memopt(char *p)
>  }
>  early_param("mem", parse_memopt);
>  
> -static int __init parse_memmap_opt(char *p)
> +static int __init parse_memmap_one(char *p)
>  {
>  	char *oldp;
>  	u64 start_at, mem_size;
> @@ -877,6 +877,20 @@ static int __init parse_memmap_opt(char *p)
>  
>  	return *p == '\0' ? 0 : -EINVAL;
>  }
> +static int __init parse_memmap_opt(char *str)
> +{
> +	while (str) {
> +		char *k = strchr(str, ',');
> +
> +		if (k)
> +			*k++ = 0;
> +
> +		parse_memmap_one(str);
> +		str = k;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
>  early_param("memmap", parse_memmap_opt);
>  
>  void __init finish_e820_parsing(void)
> -- 
> 1.7.7
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ