[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50856CC6.7010403@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:56:54 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the generic clock API available by default
On 10/22/2012 07:02 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Rather than requiring platforms to select the generic clock API to make
> it available make the API available as a user selectable option unless the
> user either selects HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK (if they have their own implementation)
> or selects COMMON_CLK (if they depend on the generic implementation).
>
> All current architectures that HAVE_CLK but don't use the common clock
> framework have selects of HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK added.
>
> This allows drivers to use the generic API on platforms which have no need
> for the clock API at platform level.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -632,6 +634,7 @@ config ARCH_TEGRA
> select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> select GENERIC_GPIO
> select HAVE_CLK
> + select HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK
> select HAVE_SMP
> select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
> select SPARSE_IRQ
Since v3.7-rc1, Tegra uses common clock, so I don't think the change
above is right is it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists