[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121022183453.GA24687@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:34:53 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lizefan@...wei.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] cgroup_freezer: don't stall transition to FROZEN
for PF_NOFREEZE or PF_FREEZER_SKIP tasks
On 10/16, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> cgroup_freezer doesn't transition from FREEZING to FROZEN if the
> cgroup contains PF_NOFREEZE tasks or tasks sleeping with
> PF_FREEZER_SKIP set.
And thus the patch looks like another bugfix to me.
Just one question, and this question is offtopic again,
> Only kernel tasks can be non-freezable (PF_NOFREEZE)
Hmm. We seem to "leak" PF_NOFREEZE if a kernel thread execs?
Perhaps do_execve_common() should do set_freezable() before return.
Or, at least, simply clear this flag along with PF_KTHREAD in
flush_old_exec().
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists