linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] x86, apic: Disable BSP if boot cpu is AP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121022183755.GE3401@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:37:55 -0400
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	x86@...nel.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
	len.brown@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
	holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] x86, apic: Disable BSP if boot cpu is AP

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:32:19PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:

[..]
> BTW, I feel you basically shows positive attitude to this patch set
> itself. I believe that kdump has merits only. Could you tell me what
> is needed for this patch set to be acked by you?

I don't have any objections to bringing up more than 1 cpu in second
kernel. Somebody who needs the code better in this area needs to provide
by Reviewed-by/Acked-by though.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/