[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK5ve-KDqi0HwE8upAmRmZUPcs=wgid_9QkQNksSGFUkWdEi+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:59:19 -0700
From: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>
Cc: akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ledtrig-cpu: use spin_lock to replace mutex lock
Hiya,
Can I get some Acked or Tested-by from Rafael or Miles before I put it
in my linux-leds tree?
Thanks,
-Bryan
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Linus Walleij
> <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Mutex lock is not safe in atomic context like the bug reported by
>>> Miles Lane:
>> (...)
>>> This patch replace mutex lock with spin lock which is safe for this case.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>
>>> Reported-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
>>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
>>
>> Looks correct to me:
>> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>>
>
> Thanks, Linus.
>
> Miles, could you please help to try this patch on your testing system?
> I really appreciate it.
>
> -Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists