[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5085B0D0.9020508@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:47:12 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
x86@...nel.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
len.brown@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] x86, apic: Disable BSP if boot cpu is AP
On 10/22/2012 01:43 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> The reason the BIOSen go wonky is the INIT cause the cpu to go to the
> reset vector at 4G-16 bytes. So it is very much expected that the
> BIOSen start acting like you just came out of reset.
>
> If you can clear bit 8 of IA32_APIC_BASE_MSR and inform the cpu to not
> send the cpu to 4G-16 bytes and instead send the cpu into it's magic
> startup-ipi-wait mode then the BIOSen will not be involved on that path.
>
> It is a simple question of does the cpu support clearing bit 8
> meaningfully.
>
> If the cpu allows bit 8 to be cleared and sends the cpu to the reset
> vector on receipt of the INIT IPI I would call that a deviation from the
> x86 cpu specification.
>
> So clearing bit 8 is not a question about BIOSen it is a question of can
> we avoid the BIOSen, by using an obscure under-documented cpu feature.
>
As I said, I thought Fenghua tried that but it didn't work, experimentally.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists