[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5085B1A8.4020609@parallels.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:50:48 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [rfc 0/2] Introducing VmFlags field into smaps output
On 10/22/2012 11:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 23:14:52 +0400
> Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys, during c/r sessions we've found that there is no way at
>> the moment to fetch some VMA associated flags, such as mlock()
>> and madvise(), thus the patches in this series intorduce new field
>> into "smaps" output called VmFlags where all flags associated with
>> the particular VMA is shown in two letter mnemonic.
>>
>> Strictly speaking for c/r we only need mlock/madvise bits but it
>> has been said that providing just a few flags looks somehow inconsistent.
>> So all flags are here now.
>>
>> Please review. Comments and complains are quite welcome!
>
> Sigh, it's still a pretty nasty-looking interface. Better ideas are
> welcomed.
Maybe just a string of two-letter short names like
VmFlags: rd wr sh sr
?
I.e. in a way flags line looks in cpuinfo file.
> I joined the patches into one, massaged the changelog a bit and added a
> couple more paragraphs explaining why we're doing this to ourselves.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists