[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5085C197.7020906@synaptics.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:58:47 -0700
From: Christopher Heiny <cheiny@...aptics.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Allie Xiong <axiong@...aptics.com>,
Vivian Ly <vly@...aptics.com>,
Daniel Rosenberg <daniel.rosenberg@...aptics.com>,
Joerie de Gram <j.de.gram@...il.com>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Naveen Kumar Gaddipati <naveen.gaddipati@...ricsson.com>,
Alexandra Chin <alexandra.chin@...synaptics.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/06] input/rmi4: Core files
On 10/10/2012 08:06 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 02:49 +0000, Christopher Heiny wrote:
>> Joe Perches wrote:
> []
>>>> + list_for_each_entry(entry, &data->rmi_functions.list, list)
>>>> + if (entry->irq_mask)
>>>> + process_one_interrupt(entry, irq_status,
>>>> + data);
>>>
>>> style nit, it'd be nicer with braces.
>>
>> I agree with you, but checkpatch.pl doesn't. :-(
>
> Sure it does.
>
> $ cat t.c
> {
> list_for_each_entry(entry, &data->rmi_functions.list, list) {
> if (entry->irq_mask)
> process_one_interrupt(entry, irq_status, data);
> }
> }
> $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict -f t.c
> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 7 lines checked
>
> t.c has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission.
I stand corrected. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists