linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/22] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:53:40 -0500
From:	Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
CC:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>,
	"Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/22] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

On 10/22/2012 07:07 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:15:00AM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>> This is the current version of the patchset I presented at the LSF-MM
>> Summit in San Francisco in April. I apologize for letting it go so
>> long before re-submitting.
>>
>> This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for
>> review in October, 2009. Feedback was positive, and I have picked up
>> where he left off, porting his patches to the latest mainline kernel
>> and adding support more file systems.
>>
>> This patch series adds a kernel interface to fs/aio.c so that kernel code can
>> issue concurrent asynchronous IO to file systems.  It adds an aio command and
>> file system methods which specify io memory with pages instead of userspace
>> addresses.
>>
>> This series was written to reduce the current overhead loop imposes by
>> performing synchronus buffered file system IO from a kernel thread.  These
>> patches turn loop into a light weight layer that translates bios into iocbs.
> 
> I note that there is no support for XFS in this patch set. Is there
> a particular problem that prevents XFS from being converted, or it
> just hasn't been done?

It just hasn't been done. It wasn't one of the trivial ones so I put it
off at first, and after that, it's an oversight. I'll follow up with an
xfs patch for your review.

Thanks,
Shaggy

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/