[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1350982301.2237.6.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:51:41 +0100
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 1/6]: PVH: basic and header changes,
elfnote changes, ...
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 14:17 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > +config XEN_X86_PVH
> > > + bool "Support for running as a PVH guest (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> > > + depends on X86_64 && XEN && EXPERIMENTAL
> > > + default n
> > > + help
> > > + This option enables support for running as a PVH guest (PV guest
> > > + using hardware extensions) under a suitably capable hypervisor.
> > > + This option is EXPERIMENTAL because the hypervisor interfaces
> > > + which it uses are not yet considered stable therefore backwards and
> > > + forwards compatibility is not yet guaranteed. If unsure, say N.
> >
> > Do we really need the kconfig symbol? Why can't we have it always
>
> Yes for right now. That is to make sure that we can test for regressions
> PV guests on a hypervisor without PVH extensions - or vice-versa:
> PVH hypervisors with an normal PV guest.
Also the "depends on X86_64" bit is currently quite important...
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists