linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] slab: move kmem_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0000013a8df775ea-2411bbc8-8025-4514-8b58-ef007d11beef-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:12:16 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
cc:	JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] slab: move kmem_cache_free to common code

On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:

> I do agree, but since freeing is ultimately dependent on the allocator
> layout, I don't see a clean way of doing this without dropping tears of
> sorrow around. The calls in slub/slab/slob would have to be somehow
> inlined. Hum... maybe it is possible to do it from
> include/linux/sl*b_def.h...
>
> Let me give it a try and see what I can come up with.

The best solution would be something that would have a consolidated
kmem_cache_free() in include/linux/slab.h.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/