linux-kernel - Re: Major performance regressions in 3.7rc1/2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1210222059120.1136@eggly.anvils>
Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Julian Wollrath <julian.wollrath@...d.uni-goettingen.de>,
	Julian Wollrath <jwollrath@....de>,
	Patrik Kullman <patrik.kullman@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Major performance regressions in 3.7rc1/2

On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:45:02 +0200
> Julian Wollrath <julian.wollrath@...d.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > seems like I found the other bad commit. Everything, which means
> > v3.7-rc*, works fine again with commit e6c509f85 (mm: use
> > clear_page_mlock() in page_remove_rmap()) and commit 957f822a0 (mm,
> > numa: reclaim from all nodes within reclaim distance) revoked.
> 
> Thanks.  Let's add some cc's.  Can you please describe your workload
> and some estimate of the slowdown?

I'm currently assuming that my clear_page_mlock() commit is innocent
of this: it went in just two before David's numa reclaim commit, and
I don't see how mine could have any such marked effect: I'm thinking
it was just a bisection hiccup that implicated it.

Julian (or Patrik), what do you find if you revert the numa reclaim
commit but leave in the clear_page_mlock commit?  Or vice versa.

Whereas David's numa reclaim distance commit does look suspicious to
me: as I read it (perhaps wrongly), zone_reclaim_mode would previously
have stayed 0 if all nodes were close or equidistant (e.g. CONFIG_NUMA=y
on a non-NUMA machine), but now it would be 1 in this case, invoking
zone_reclaim() more frequently than before.

Hugh

> 
> Patrik has also seen this and his description is
> 
> : I'm using an Asus Zenbook UX31E and have been installing all RCs in
> : hope of improving the Wireless and Touchpad functionality.
> : However, when trying 3.7 (rc1 and now rc2) I have major performance issues.
> : 
> : Easiest way to reproduce is to launch and play a game like Nexuiz,
> : where the computer will lag, stutter and freeze until the machine is
> : unresponsive within a couple of minutes.
> : But an easy workload like browsing will also cause lags when switching
> : tabs or redrawing a web page after a tab switch.
> : Basically 3.7 is unusable for this machine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/