[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomectx_7Ox5os-MEA7iGsLQbDMQ_7ryuFyD437uf_Dmbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:07:19 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Cc: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
spear-devel@...t.st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] PWM: Add SPEAr PWM chip driver support
On 24 October 2012 11:21, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@...onic-design.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:36:41PM +0530, Shiraz Hashim wrote:
>> + ret = pwmchip_add(&pc->chip);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pwmchip_add() failed: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(pc->clk);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip);
>
> I think in order to fix the potential race condition that Viresh
> mentioned we should move the clk_prepare_enable() before the
> pwmchip_add(), but don't forget to disable and unprepare the clock if
> pwmchip_add() fails.
>
> Actually, can't we make it a clk_prepare() only at this point and move
> the clk_enable() and clk_disable() into the if block below? In case the
> compatible value is not "st,spear1340-pwm" we don't need the clock
> enabled.
We should. I should have given this comment earlier.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists