[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-58e9eaf06f5476cb2192ec1d012674ce5e79dd21@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:01:36 -0700
From: tip-bot for Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
vincent.weaver@...ne.edu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86: Remove P6 cpuc->enabled check
Commit-ID: 58e9eaf06f5476cb2192ec1d012674ce5e79dd21
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/58e9eaf06f5476cb2192ec1d012674ce5e79dd21
Author: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
AuthorDate: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:33:38 -0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:32:00 +0200
perf/x86: Remove P6 cpuc->enabled check
Between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34 the PMU code was made modular.
The x86_pmu_enable() call was extended to disable cpuc->enabled
and iterate the counters, enabling one at a time, before calling
enable_all() at the end, followed by re-enabling cpuc->enabled.
Since cpuc->enabled was set to 0, that change effectively caused
the "val |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE;" code in p6_pmu_enable_event()
and p6_pmu_disable_event() to be dead code that was never called.
This change removes this code (which was confusing) and adds some
extra commentary to make it more clear what is going on.
Signed-off-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.02.1210191732000.14552@vincent-weaver-1.um.maine.edu
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c
index 9582fcb..7d0270b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c
@@ -157,25 +157,25 @@ static void p6_pmu_enable_all(int added)
static inline void
p6_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
{
- struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
u64 val = P6_NOP_EVENT;
- if (cpuc->enabled)
- val |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE;
-
(void)wrmsrl_safe(hwc->config_base, val);
}
static void p6_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
{
- struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
u64 val;
val = hwc->config;
- if (cpuc->enabled)
- val |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE;
+
+ /*
+ * p6 only has a global event enable, set on PerfEvtSel0
+ * We "disable" events by programming P6_NOP_EVENT
+ * and we rely on p6_pmu_enable_all() being called
+ * to actually enable the events.
+ */
(void)wrmsrl_safe(hwc->config_base, val);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists