linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Provide a comment in uapi/asm/hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22333.1351077173@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:12:53 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Provide a comment in uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h

Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:

> Just wondering, have the tools/perf/ issues been solved in your 
> tree, are the x86 UAPI disintegration changes pullable?

Did you have a look at the set of five patches I sent?  I think those should
fix up perf and building tools with O=, but I'm not sure whether we want the
last two.  From commits already made, I'm guessing that at least patch #4
should be made.

Note that the disintegrate-x86 branch does not include any perf fixes.  I can
regenerate that with some or all of them, once I know what they will be.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/